Method

How this was built, and what it does not claim

The consensus rule

Each reading states what the commentaries hold in common on that ayah. Where they differ, the reading says nothing. It does not adjudicate, does not write “some say”, and does not name a school. The purpose is a page a Muslim of any background can read without being handed a dispute.

The cost of that rule is real and should be weighed: a reader is not told when a serious disagreement exists. Whether that trade is right is the first question we are putting to you.

What is mechanically guaranteed

What is NOT guaranteed, stated plainly

What this project does not attempt

It is not a new translation of the Qur’an, and adds no commentary of its own. It does not rank the commentators, does not decide between them, and does not issue any ruling. It compresses; it never adds.

The repair now under way

Every claim each commentary makes on an ayah is being extracted and counted. A claim asserted by three or more editions becomes a required element, and a gate refuses any reading that drops one, naming the editions that assert it. On ten test ayat this found 53 dropped elements - including, at 4:34, the qualification that the striking is ghayr mubarriḥ. Your comments will be folded into the same repair pass.